Paper detail

Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-Bandits

In this paper, we study the application of the Thompson sampling (TS) methodology to the stochastic combinatorial multi-armed bandit (CMAB) framework. We first analyze the standard TS algorithm for the general CMAB model when the outcome distributions of all the base arms are independent, and obtain a distribution-dependent regret bound of $O(m\log K_{\max}\log T / Δ_{\min})$, where $m$ is the number of base arms, $K_{\max}$ is the size of the largest super arm, $T$ is the time horizon, and $Δ_{\min}$ is the minimum gap between the expected reward of the optimal solution and any non-optimal solution. This regret upper bound is better than the $O(m(\log K_{\max})^2\log T / Δ_{\min})$ bound in prior works. Moreover, our novel analysis techniques can help to tighten the regret bounds of other existing UCB-based policies (e.g., ESCB), as we improve the method of counting the cumulative regret. Then we consider the matroid bandit setting (a special class of CMAB model), where we could remove the independence assumption across arms and achieve a regret upper bound that matches the lower bound. Except for the regret upper bounds, we also point out that one cannot directly replace the exact offline oracle (which takes the parameters of an offline problem instance as input and outputs the exact best action under this instance) with an approximation oracle in TS algorithm for even the classical MAB problem. Finally, we use some experiments to show the comparison between regrets of TS and other existing algorithms, the experimental results show that TS outperforms existing baselines.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.