Paper detail

Thermonuclear Reaction Rate of $^{30}$Si(p,$γ$)$^{31}$P

Silicon synthesis in high-temperature hydrogen burning environments presents one possible avenue for the study of abundance anomalies in globular clusters. This was suggested in a previous study, which found that the large uncertainties associated with the $^{30}$Si(p,$γ$)$^{31}$P reaction rate preclude a firm understanding of the stellar conditions that give rise to the Mg-K anti-correlation observed in the globular cluster NGC 2419. In an effort to improve the reaction rate, we present new strength measurements of the $E_r^{lab} = 435$ keV and $E_r^{lab} = 501$ keV resonances in $^{30}$Si(p,$γ$)$^{31}$P. For the former, which was previously unobserved, we obtain a resonance strength of $ωγ= (1.28 \pm 0.25$) $\times 10^{-4}$ eV. For the latter, we obtain a value of $ωγ= (1.88 \pm 0.14)$ $\times 10^{-1}$ eV, which has a smaller uncertainty compared to previously measured strengths. Based on these results, the thermonuclear reaction rate has been re-evaluated. The impact of the new measurements is to lower the reaction rate by a factor of $\approx$10 at temperatures important to the study of NGC 2419. The rate uncertainty at these temperatures has also been reduced significantly.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.