Paper detail

Thermonuclear 17O(n,gamma)18O reaction rate and its astrophysical implications

A new thermonuclear $^{17}$O($n$,$γ$)$^{18}$O rate is derived based on a complete calculation of the direct-capture (DC) and resonant-capture contributions, for a temperature region up to 2 GK of astrophysical interest. We have firstly calculated the DC and subthreshold contributions in the energy region up to 1 MeV, and estimated the associated uncertainties by a Monte-Carlo approach. It shows that the present rate is remarkably larger than that adopted in the JINA REACLIB in the temperature region of 0.01 $\sim$ 2 GK, by up to a factor of $\sim$80. The astrophysical impacts of our rate have been examined in both $s$-process and $r$-process models. In our main $s$-process model which simulates flash-driven convective mixing in metal deficient asymptotic giant branch stars, both $^{18}$O and $^{19}$F abundances in interpulse phases are enhanced dramatically by factors of $\sim 20$--$40$ due to the new larger $^{17}$O($n$,$γ$)$^{18}$O rate. It shows, however, that this reaction hardly affects the weak $s$-process in massive stars since the $^{17}$O abundance never becomes significantly large in the massive stars. For the $r$-process nucleosynthesis, we have studied impacts of our rate in both the collapsar and neutron burst models, and found that the effect can be neglected, although an interesting "loophole" effect is found owing to the enhanced new rate, which significantly changes the final nuclear abundances if fission recycling is not involved in the model, however, these significant differences are almost completely washed out if the fission recycling is considered.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.