Paper detail

Thermodynamics in Closed Universe with Entropy Corrections

We discuss the generalized second law of thermodynamics in three different systems by taking quantum corrections (logarithmic and power law) to cosmological horizon entropy as well as black hole entropy. Firstly, we consider phantom energy accretion onto the Schwarzschild black hole in the closed FRW universe and investigate validity of the generalized second law of thermodynamics on the apparent and event horizons. In another scenario, we evaluate the critical mass of the Schwarzschild black hole with upper and lower bounds under accretion process due to phantom-like modified generalized chaplygin gas. It is found that the generalized second law of thermodynamics is respected within these bounds and black hole cannot accrete outside them. Finally, we explore this law for a closed universe filled with interacting $n$-components of fluid (in thermal equilibrium case) and with non-interacting dark matter and dark energy components (in thermal non-equilibrium case) on the apparent and event horizons and find conditions for its validity.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.