Paper detail

Thermodynamic anomalies in a lattice model of water: Solvation properties

We investigate a lattice-fluid model of water, defined on a 3-dimensional body-centered cubic lattice. Model molecules possess a tetrahedral symmetry, with four equivalent bonding arms. The model is similar to the one proposed by Roberts and Debenedetti [J. Chem. Phys. 105, 658 (1996)], simplified by removing distinction between "donors" and "acceptors". We focus on solvation properties, mainly as far as an ideally inert (hydrophobic) solute is concerned. As in our previous analysis, devoted to neat water [J. Chem. Phys. 121, 11856 (2004)], we make use of a generalized first order approximation on a tetrahedral cluster. We show that the model exhibits quite a coherent picture of water thermodynamics, reproducing qualitatively several anomalous properties observed both in pure water and in solutions of hydrophobic solutes. As far as supercooled liquid water is concerned, the model is consistent with the second critical point scenario.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.