Paper detail

Thermal X-ray iron line emission from the advection dominated accretion flow in the galactic binary GX 339-4

We explore thermal X-ray iron line emission from the galactic X-ray binary GX 339-4 in the off state, using the models of the advection dominated accretion flow (ADAF) without or with outflows. The equivalent widths of hydrogen-like and helium-like thermal iron lines are calculated with different model parameters including viscosity parameter $α$, mass accretion rate at the outer radius of the ADAF $\dot{m}_{\rm out}$ and outflow strength parameter $p$. Our calculations show that the equivalent widths of thermal iron lines emitted from the pure ADAF, i.e., the ADAF without outflows, should be very small, assuming a solar metallicity for the accreting gas in the accretion flow. Strong thermal iron lines are expected to be emitted from the ADAF with relatively strong outflows. {For reasonable choice of parameters, the total equivalent width of the He-like and H-like thermal iron lines reaches to $\gtrsim 500$ eV for accreting gas with solar metallicity. The observation of strong thermal X-ray lines from GX 339-4 at the off state may give a clue to the accretion mode of the source and provide evidence for the presence of outflows/winds in the accretion flow around the black hole in GX 339-4. It is found that the values of $\dot{m}_{\rm out}$ and $p$ are degenerate, i.e., the observed X-ray continuum spectrum can be fairly well reproduced with different sets of the parameters $\dot{m}_{\rm out}$ and $p$. Such {degeneracy} can be broken when the thermal X-ray line emission data is available. We also compare our results with those in the previous similar work.}

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.