Paper detail

Thermal transport controlled by intra- and inter-dot Coulomb interactions in sequential and cotunneling serially-coupled double quantum dots

We study thermoelectric transport through a serial double quantum dot (DQD) coupled to two metallic leads with different thermal energies. We take into account the electron sequential and cotunneling effects via different master equation approaches. In the absence of intra- and inter-dot Coulomb interactions, a small peak in thermoelectric and heat currents is found for $E_{\rm L} \text{=} E_{\rm R}$ indicating the Coulomb blockade DQD regime, where $E_{\rm L}(E_{\rm R})$ is the energy of the state of the left(right) quantum dot. In the presence of intra- and inter-dot Coulomb interactions with strengths U$_{\rm intra}$, and U$_{\rm inter}$, respectively, avoided crossings or resonance energies between the intra- and the inter-dot two-electron states, 2ES, are found. These resonances induce extra transport channels through the DQD leading to strong side peaks in the thermoelectric and heat currents at $ E_{\rm L} \text{-} E_{\rm R} = \pm (U_{\rm intra} \text{-} U_{\rm inter})$ in addition to the main peak generated at $E_{\rm L} \text{=} E_{\rm R}$. The current side peaks are enhanced by increased strength of the Coulomb interactions. Interestingly, the current side peaks are enhanced when cotunneling terms are considered in which the resonances of the 2ESs assist the electron cotunneling process through the system. Furthermore, the issue of coherences is carefully checked in the DQD-leads system via different approaches to the master equation, which are the Pauli, the Redfield, a first order Lindblad, and the first- and second order von-Neumann methods. We realize that the Pauli method gives a wrong results for the thermoelectric transport when the role of the coherences is relevant.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.