Paper detail

Thermal transport across nanometre gaps: phonon transmission vs air conduction

Heat transfer between two surfaces separated by a nanometre gap is important for a number of applications ranging from spaced head disk systems, scanning thermal microscopy and thermal transport in aerogels. At these separation distances, near field radiative heat transfer competes with heat transfer mediated by phonons. Here we quantify the contribution of phonon assisted heat transfer between apolar solids using lattice dynamics combined with ab-initio calculations. We clearly demonstrate that phonons dominate heat transfer for subnanometre gaps. Strikingly, we conclude that even in the situation where the gap is filled with air molecules, phonons provide the dominant energy channel between the two solids nearly in contact. Our results predict orders of magnitude enhanced phonon heat transfer compared to previous works and bring forward a methodology to analyse phonon transmission across nanoscale vacuum gaps between apolar materials.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.