Paper detail

Thermal radiation of Er doped dielectric crystals: Probing the range of applicability of the Kirchhoff law

The Kirchhoff law of thermal radiation, relating emissivity ε and absorptance α, has been originally formulated for opaque bodies in thermodynamic equilibrium with the environment. However, in many systems of practical importance, both assumptions are often not satisfied. In this work, we revisit the century-old law and examine the limits of its applicability in an example of Er:YAG and Er:YLF dielectric crystals, potential radiation converters for thermophotovoltaic applications. In our experiments, the (80 at.%) Er:YAG crystal was opaque between 1.45 μm and 1.64 μm. In this spectral range, its absorptance α(λ) is spectrally flat and differentiates from unity only by a small amount of reflection. The shape of the emissivity spectrum ε(λ) closely matches that of absorptance α(λ), suggesting that the Kirchhoff law can adequately describe thermal radiation of opaque bodies, even if the requirement of thermodynamic equilibrium is not satisfied. The(20 at.%) Er:YLF crystal had smaller size, lower concentration of Er ions, and it was not opaque. Nevertheless, its spectrum of emissivity ε(λ) had almost the same shape (between 1.45 μm and 1.62 μm) as the spectrum of absorptance α(λ) derived from the transmission measurements. This observation is in line with our prediction that the spectra of emissivity and absorptance should have identical shapes in optically thin slabs. We, thus, show that the Kirchhoff law of thermal radiation can be extended (with caution) even to not-opaque bodies away from the thermodynamic equilibrium.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.