Paper detail

Thermal conductivity of superfluid $^3$He-B in a tubular channel down to 0.1$T_c$ at the $^4$He crystallization pressure

We studied the thermal conductivity of superfluid $^3$He in a 2.5 mm effective diameter and 0.15 m long channel connecting the two volumes of our experimental assembly. The main volume contained pure solid $^4$He, pure liquid $^3$He and saturated liquid $^3$He-$^4$He mixture at varying proportions, while the separate heat-exchanger volume housed sinter and was filled by liquid $^3$He. The system was cooled externally by a copper nuclear demagnetization stage, and, as an option, internally by the adiabatic melting of solid $^4$He in the main volume. The counterflow effect of superfluid just below the transition temperature $T_c$ resulted in the highest observed conductivity about five times larger than that of the normal fluid at the $T_c$. Once the hydrodynamic contribution had practically vanished below $0.5T_c$, we first observed almost constant conductivity nearly equal to the normal fluid value at the $T_c$. Finally, below about $0.3T_c$, the conductivity rapidly falls off towards lower temperatures.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.