Paper detail

Theory News on $B_{s(d)} \to μ^+μ^-$ Decays

The rare decays $B_{s(d)} \to μ^+μ^-$ play a key role for the testing of the Standard Model. An overview of the most recent theoretical predictions of the corresponding branching ratios is given, emphasizing that the sizable decay width difference $ΔΓ_s$ of the $B_s$-meson system affects the $B_s\to μ^+μ^-$ channel. As a consequence, the calculated Standard Model branching ratio has to be upscaled by about 10% to BR$(B_s\to μ^+μ^-)=(3.54\pm0.30)\times 10^{-9}$. This prediction is the reference value for the comparison with the time-integrated experimental branching ratio, where LHCb has recently reported $(3.2^{+1.5}_{-1.2})\times10^{-9}$ corresponding to the first evidence for $B_s\to μ^+μ^-$. The $ΔΓ_s$ effects have also to be included in the constraints on the parameter space of New-Physics models following from the experimental data. Furthermore, $ΔΓ_s$ makes a new observable through the effective $B_s\to μ^+μ^-$ lifetime accessible, which probes New Physics in a way complementary to the branching ratio and adds an exciting new topic to the agenda for the high-luminosity upgrade of the LHC.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.