Paper detail

Theoretical Interpretation of Learned Step Size in Deep-Unfolded Gradient Descent

Deep unfolding is a promising deep-learning technique in which an iterative algorithm is unrolled to a deep network architecture with trainable parameters. In the case of gradient descent algorithms, as a result of the training process, one often observes the acceleration of the convergence speed with learned non-constant step size parameters whose behavior is not intuitive nor interpretable from conventional theory. In this paper, we provide a theoretical interpretation of the learned step size of deep-unfolded gradient descent (DUGD). We first prove that the training process of DUGD reduces not only the mean squared error loss but also the spectral radius related to the convergence rate. Next, we show that minimizing the upper bound of the spectral radius naturally leads to the Chebyshev step which is a sequence of the step size based on Chebyshev polynomials. The numerical experiments confirm that the Chebyshev steps qualitatively reproduce the learned step size parameters in DUGD, which provides a plausible interpretation of the learned parameters. Additionally, we show that the Chebyshev steps achieve the lower bound of the convergence rate for the first-order method in a specific limit without learning parameters or momentum terms.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.