Paper detail

The X-ray, Optical and Infrared Counterpart to GRB 980703

We report on X-ray, optical and infrared follow-up observations of GRB 980703. We detect a previously unknown X-ray source in the GRB error box; assuming a power law decline we find for its decay index alpha < -0.91 (3-sigma). We invoke host galaxy extinction to match the observed spectral slope with the slope expected from `fireball' models. We find no evidence for a spectral break in the infrared to X-ray spectral range on 1998 July 4.4, and determine a lower limit of the cooling break frequency: nu_c > 1.3 x 10^{17} Hz. For this epoch we obtain an extinction of A_V = 1.50 +/- 0.11. From the X-ray data we estimate the optical extinction to be A_V = 20.2 +12.3 -7.3, inconsistent with the former value. Our optical spectra confirm the redshift of z = 0.966 found by Djorgovski et al. (1998). We compare the afterglow of GRB 980703 with that of GRB 970508 and find that the fraction of the energy in the magnetic field, epsilon_B < 6x10^{-5}, is much lower in the case of GRB 980703, which is a consequence of the high frequency of the cooling break.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access39 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.