Paper detail

The Williams Bjerknes Model on Regular Trees

We consider the Williams Bjerknes model, also known as the biased voter model on the $d$-regular tree $\bbT^d$, where $d \geq 3$. Starting from an initial configuration of &#34;healthy&#34; and &#34;infected&#34; vertices, infected vertices infect their neighbors at Poisson rate $λ\geq 1$, while healthy vertices heal their neighbors at Poisson rate 1. All vertices act independently. It is well known that starting from a configuration with a positive but finite number of infected vertices, infected vertices will continue to exist at all time with positive probability iff $λ> 1$. We show that there exists a threshold $λ_c \in (1, \infty)$ such that if $λ> λ_c$ then in the above setting with positive probability all vertices will become eventually infected forever, while if $λ< λ_c$, all vertices will become eventually healthy with probability 1. In particular, this yields a complete convergence theorem for the model and its dual, a certain branching coalescing random walk on $\bbT^d$ -- above $λ_c$. We also treat the case of initial configurations chosen according to a distribution which is invariant or ergodic with respect to the group of automorphisms of $\bbT^d$.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.