Paper detail

The Wake of a Quark Moving through Hot QCD Plasmas vs. N = 4 SYM Plasmas

We present the energy density and flux distribution of a heavy quark moving through high temperature QCD plasmas and compare them with those in the strongly coupled N = 4 SYM plasma. The Boltzmann equation is reformulated as a Fokker-Planck equation at the leading log approximation and is solved numerically with nontrivial boundary conditions in momentum space. We use kinetic theory and perform a Fourier transform to calculate the energy and momentum density in position space. The angular distributions exhibit the transition to the ideal hydrodynamics and are analyzed with the first and second order hydrodynamic source. The AdS/CFT correspondence allows the same calculation at strong coupling. Compared to the kinetic theory results, the energy-momentum tensor is better described by hydrodynamics even after accounting for the differences in the shear viscosities. We argue that the difference between the Boltzmann equation and the AdS/CFT correspondence comes from the second order hydrodynamic coefficient $τ_π$ which is generically large compared to the shear length in a theory based on the Boltzmann equation.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.