Paper detail

The VANDELS survey: the relation between UV continuum slope and stellar metallicity in star-forming galaxies at z~3

The estimate of stellar metallicities (Z*) of high-z galaxies are of paramount importance in order to understand the complexity of dust effects and the reciprocal interrelations among stellar mass, dust attenuation, stellar age, and metallicity. Benefiting from uniquely deep FUV spectra of >500 star-forming galaxies at redshifts 2<z<5 extracted from the VANDELS survey and stacked in bins of stellar mass (M*) and UV continuum slope (beta), we estimate their stellar metallicities Z* from stellar photospheric absorption features at 1501 and 1719 Angstrom, which are calibrated with Starburst99 models and are largely unaffected by stellar age, dust, IMF, nebular continuum or interstellar absorption. Comparing them to photometric based spectral slopes in the range 1250-1750 Angstrom, we find that the stellar metallicity increases by ~0.5 dex from beta ~ -2 to beta ~ -1 (1 < A(1600) < 3.2), and a dependence with beta holds at fixed UV absolute luminosity M(UV) and stellar mass up to 10^(9.65) Msun. As a result, the metallicity is a fundamental ingredient for properly rescaling dust corrections based on M(UV) and M*. Using the same absorption features, we analyze the mass-metallicity relation (MZR) and find it is consistent with the previous VANDELS estimation based on a global fit of the FUV spectra. Similarly, we do not find a significant evolution between z=2 and z=3.5. Finally, the slopes of our MZR and Z*-beta relation are in agreement with the predictions of well-studied semi-analytic models of galaxy formation (SAM), while some tensions with observations remain as to the absolute metallicity normalization. The relation between UV slope and stellar metallicity is fundamental for the exploitation of large volume surveys with next-generation telescopes and for the physical characterization of galaxies in the first billion years of our Universe.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.