Paper detail

The Unique Games Conjecture, Integrality Gap for Cut Problems and Embeddability of Negative Type Metrics into $\ell_1$

In this paper, we disprove a conjecture of Goemans and Linial; namely, that every negative type metric embeds into $\ell_1$ with constant distortion. We show that for an arbitrarily small constant $δ> 0$, for all large enough $n$, there is an $n$-point negative type metric which requires distortion at least $(\log\log n)^{1/6-δ}$ to embed into $\ell_1.$ Surprisingly, our construction is inspired by the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC) of Khot, establishing a previously unsuspected connection between probabilistically checkable proof systems (PCPs) and the theory of metric embeddings. We first prove that the UGC implies a super-constant hardness result for the (non-uniform) Sparsest Cut problem. Though this hardness result relies on the UGC, we demonstrate, nevertheless, that the corresponding PCP reduction can be used to construct an "integrality gap instance" for Sparsest Cut. Towards this, we first construct an integrality gap instance for a natural SDP relaxation of Unique Games. Then we "simulate" the PCP reduction and "translate" the integrality gap instance of Unique Games to an integrality gap instance of Sparsest Cut. This enables us to prove a $(\log \log n)^{1/6-δ}$ integrality gap for Sparsest Cut, which is known to be equivalent to the metric embedding lower bound.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.