Abstract

The principle ADSADS asserts that every linear order on ωω has an infinite ascending or descending sequence. This has been studied extensively in the reverse mathematics literature, beginning with the work of Hirschfeldt and Shore. We introduce the principle ADCADC, which asserts that linear order has an infinite ascending or descending chain. The two are easily seen to be equivalent over the base system RCA0RCA_0 of second order arithmetic; they are even computably equivalent. However, we prove that ADCADC is strictly weaker than ADSADS under Weihrauch (uniform) reducibility. In fact, we show that even the principle SADSSADS, which is the restriction of ADSADS to linear orders of type ω+ω∗ω+ ω^*, is not Weihrauch reducible to ADCADC. In this connection, we define a more natural stable form of ADSADS that we call General-SADSGeneral\text-SADS, which is the restriction of ADSADS to linear orders of type k+ωk + ω, ω+ω∗ω+ ω^*, or ω+kω+ k, where kk is a finite number. We define GeneralSADCGeneralSADC analogously. We prove that GeneralSADCGeneralSADC is not Weihrauch reducible to SADSSADS, and so in particular, each of SADSSADS and SADCSADC is strictly weaker under Weihrauch reducibility than its general version. Finally, we turn to the principle CACCAC, which asserts that every partial order on ωω has an infinite chain or antichain. This has two previously studied stable variants, SCACSCAC and WSCACWSCAC, which were introduced by Hirschfeldt and Jockusch, and by Jockusch, Kastermans, Lempp, Lerman, and Solomon, respectively, and which are known to be equivalent over RCA0RCA_0. Here, we show that SCACSCAC is strictly weaker than WSCACWSCAC under even computable reducibility.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.