Paper detail

The Tutte expansion revisited

The Tutte polynomial of a connected graph was originally defined by Tutte as a sum over all spanning trees of monomials depending on a fixed linear order on the set of edges. Tuttle proved that while these monomials do depend on the linear order, the sum does not. The present paper is a result of a reflection upon this classical theorem of Tutte. It is devoted to an elementary and detailed proof of this theorem in its natural generality, i.e. not for graphs, but for matroids. In contrast with usual methods, the emphasis is on the properties of maps (as opposed to elements) naturally associated to a matroid (or a graph) and an order. In order to fully explain the four-fold symmetry of the proof, we introduce notion of linking between two matroids on the same set. While every matroid is, in fact, linked only to itself and to its dual matroid, the notion of a linking identifies the essential features of the theory and allows to replace the usual four similar arguments by a single one. This is done in Theorem 9.1, which is the focal point of the present paper. With the exception of Introduction, the present paper is self-contained modulo basic concepts related to sets and maps. In particular, no knowledge of the matroid theory or of the graph theory is assumed.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.