The tractability landscape of diffusion alignment: regularization, rewards, and computational primitives

Inference-time reward alignment asks how to turn a pre-trained diffusion model with base law $p$ into a sampler that favors a reward $r$ while remaining close to $p$. Since there is no canonical distributional distance for this closeness constraint, different choices lead to different "reward-aligned" laws and, just as importantly, different algorithmic problems. We develop a primitive-based approach to reward alignment: rather than assuming arbitrary reward-aligned laws can be sampled, we ask which simple algorithmic primitives suffice to implement alignment for non-trivial reward classes. If closeness is measured in KL distance, the target law is $q(x) \propto p(x) \exp(λ^{-1}r(x))$. For this setting, we show that linear exponential tilts of the form $q(x)\propto p(x)\exp(\langle θ, x \rangle)$ -- which according to recent work [MRR26] can be efficiently sampled from -- are a sufficient primitive for aligning to a very broad class of convex low-dimensional rewards. If closeness is measured in Wasserstein distance, the corresponding primitive is a proximal transport oracle: given $x$, solve $\mbox{argmax}_y \{r(y)- λc(x,y)\}$. This oracle can be efficiently implemented for concave or low-dimensional Lipschitz rewards $r(x)=f(Ax)$. Together, these results illustrate that the choice of distribution distance for alignment affects the computational primitive and the tractable reward class.

No reviews yet.

No comments yet.