Paper detail

The topological inequivalence of Hall bar versus Corbino geometries in real space

This work discusses the effect of topology in the frame of direct Coulomb interactions, considering two distinct geometries, namely the Hall bar and the Corbino disc. In the mainstream approaches to the quantized Hall effect, the consequences of interactions are usually underestimated. Here, we investigate the electron number density, potential and current distributions within the screening theory that considers electron-electron interactions. Inclusion of direct Coulomb interaction and realistic boundary conditions result in local metal-like compressible and (Topological) insulator-like incompressible regions. Consequently, we show that the bulk of both geometries in coordinate space is not incompressible throughout the quantized Hall plateau. Furthermore, placing two inner contacts within the Hall bar geometry shows that the quantization is unaffected by changing the genus number in real space. Finally, we propose novel experiments which will enable us to distinguish the topological properties of the two geometries in the configuration space.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.