Paper detail

The top quark forward-backward asymmetry at approximate N$^3$LO

I calculate the top quark forward-backward asymmetry at the Tevatron in both the laboratory frame and the $t{\bar t}$ rest frame. I show that soft-gluon corrections are the dominant contribution to the asymmetry and closely approximate exact results through next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO). I present a calculation of the asymmetry including approximate next-to-next-to-next-to-leading-order (N$^3$LO) soft-gluon contributions from next-to-next-to-leading-logarithm (NNLL) resummation as well as electroweak corrections. Thus approximate N$^3$LO (aN$^3$LO) results are obtained, which significantly enhance and improve previous NNLO results. The theoretical aN$^3$LO result for the top quark forward-backward asymmetry at the Tevatron in the laboratory frame is ($6.8 \pm 0.3$)\%, and in the $t{\bar t}$ rest frame it is ($10.0 \pm 0.6$)\% which is in excellent agreement with recent Tevatron data.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.