Paper detail

The Threshold Dimension and Irreducible Graphs

Let $G$ be a graph, and let $u$, $v$, and $w$ be vertices of $G$. If the distance between $u$ and $w$ does not equal the distance between $v$ and $w$, then $w$ is said to resolve $u$ and $v$. The metric dimension of $G$, denoted $β(G)$, is the cardinality of a smallest set $W$ of vertices such that every pair of vertices of $G$ is resolved by some vertex of $W$. The threshold dimension of $G$, denoted $τ(G)$, is the minimum metric dimension among all graphs $H$ having $G$ as a spanning subgraph. In other words, the threshold dimension of $G$ is the minimum metric dimension among all graphs obtained from $G$ by adding edges. If $β(G) = τ(G)$, then $G$ is said to be irreducible. We give two upper bounds for the threshold dimension of a graph, the first in terms of the diameter, and the second in terms of the chromatic number. As a consequence, we show that every planar graph of order $n$ has threshold dimension $O (\log_2 n)$. We show that several infinite families of graphs, known to have metric dimension $3$, are in fact irreducible. Finally, we show that for any integers $n$ and $b$ with $1 \leq b < n$, there is an irreducible graph of order $n$ and metric dimension $b$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.