Researcher profile

Ortrud R. Oellermann

Ortrud R. Oellermann contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Enumerating the Digitally Convex Sets of Powers of Cycles and Cartesian Products of Paths and Complete Graphs

Given a finite set $V$, a convexity $\mathscr{C}$, is a collection of subsets of $V$ that contains both the empty set and the set $V$ and is closed under intersections. The elements of $\mathscr{C}$ are called convex sets. The digital convexity, originally proposed as a tool for processing digital images, is defined as follows: a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ is digitally convex if, for every $v\in V(G)$, we have $N[v]\subseteq N[S]$ implies $v\in S$. The number of cyclic binary strings with blocks of length at least $k$ is expressed as a linear recurrence relation for $k\geq 2$. A bijection is established between these cyclic binary strings and the digitally convex sets of the $(k-1)^{th}$ power of a cycle. A closed formula for the number of digitally convex sets of the Cartesian product of two complete graphs is derived. A bijection is established between the digitally convex sets of the Cartesian product of two paths, $P_n \square P_m$, and certain types of $n \times m$ binary arrays.

preprint2020arXiv

The Threshold Dimension and Irreducible Graphs

Let $G$ be a graph, and let $u$, $v$, and $w$ be vertices of $G$. If the distance between $u$ and $w$ does not equal the distance between $v$ and $w$, then $w$ is said to resolve $u$ and $v$. The metric dimension of $G$, denoted $β(G)$, is the cardinality of a smallest set $W$ of vertices such that every pair of vertices of $G$ is resolved by some vertex of $W$. The threshold dimension of $G$, denoted $τ(G)$, is the minimum metric dimension among all graphs $H$ having $G$ as a spanning subgraph. In other words, the threshold dimension of $G$ is the minimum metric dimension among all graphs obtained from $G$ by adding edges. If $β(G) = τ(G)$, then $G$ is said to be irreducible. We give two upper bounds for the threshold dimension of a graph, the first in terms of the diameter, and the second in terms of the chromatic number. As a consequence, we show that every planar graph of order $n$ has threshold dimension $O (\log_2 n)$. We show that several infinite families of graphs, known to have metric dimension $3$, are in fact irreducible. Finally, we show that for any integers $n$ and $b$ with $1 \leq b < n$, there is an irreducible graph of order $n$ and metric dimension $b$.

preprint2020arXiv

The Threshold Dimension of a Graph

Let $G$ be a graph, and let $u$, $v$, and $w$ be vertices of $G$. If the distance between $u$ and $w$ does not equal the distance between $v$ and $w$, then $w$ is said to resolve $u$ and $v$. The metric dimension of $G$, denoted $β(G)$, is the cardinality of a smallest set $W$ of vertices such that every pair of vertices of $G$ is resolved by some vertex of $W$. The threshold dimension of a graph $G$, denoted $τ(G)$, is the minimum metric dimension among all graphs $H$ having $G$ as a spanning subgraph. In other words, the threshold dimension of $G$ is the minimum metric dimension among all graphs obtained from $G$ by adding edges. If $β(G) = τ(G)$, then $G$ is said to be \emph{irreducible}; otherwise, we say that $G$ is reducible. If $H$ is a graph having $G$ as a spanning subgraph and such that $β(H)=τ(G)$, then $H$ is called a threshold graph of $G$. The threshold dimension of a graph is expressed in terms of a minimum number of strong products of paths that admits a certain type of embedding of the graph. A sharp upper bound for the threshold dimension of trees is established. It is also shown that the irreducible trees are precisely those of metric dimension at most 2. Moreover, if $T$ is a tree with metric dimension 3 or 4, then $T$ has threshold dimension $2$. It is shown, in these two cases, that a threshold graph for $T$ can be obtained by adding exactly one or two edges to $T$, respectively. However, these results do not extend to trees with metric dimension $5$, i.e., there are trees of metric dimension $5$ with threshold dimension exceeding $2$.

preprint2020arXiv

The Threshold Strong Dimension of a Graph

Let $G$ be a connected graph and $u,v$ and $w$ vertices of $G$. Then $w$ is said to {\em strongly resolve} $u$ and $v$, if there is either a shortest $u$-$w$ path that contains $v$ or a shortest $v$-$w$ path that contains $u$. A set $W$ of vertices of $G$ is a {\em strong resolving set} if every pair of vertices of $G$ is strongly resolved by some vertex of $W$. A smallest strong resolving set of a graph is called a {\em strong basis} and its cardinality, denoted $β_s(G)$, the {\em strong dimension} of $G$. The {\em threshold strong dimension} of a graph $G$, denoted $τ_s(G)$, is the smallest strong dimension among all graphs having $G$ as spanning subgraph. A graph whose strong dimension equals its threshold strong dimension is called $β_s$-{\em irreducible}. In this paper we establish a geometric characterization for the threshold strong dimension of a graph $G$ that is expressed in terms of the smallest number of paths (each of sufficiently large order) whose strong product admits a certain type of embedding of $G$. We demonstrate that the threshold strong dimension of a graph is not equal to the previously studied threshold dimension of a graph. Graphs with strong dimension $1$ and $2$ are necessarily $β_s$-irreducible. It is well-known that the only graphs with strong dimension $1$ are the paths. We completely describe graphs with strong dimension $2$ in terms of the strong resolving graphs introduced by Oellermann and Peters-Fransen. We obtain sharp upper bounds for the threshold strong dimension of general graphs and determine exact values for this invariant for certain subclasses of trees.