Paper detail

The thermodynamic properties of the high-pressure superconducting state in the hydrogen-rich compounds

The ab initio calculations suggest that the superconducting state in CaH6 under the pressure at 150 GPa has the highest critical temperature among the examined hydrogen-rich compounds. For this reason, the relevant thermodynamic parameters of the superconducting state in CaH6 have been determined; a wide range of the Coulomb pseudopotential has been assumed: $μ^{\star}\in\left<0.1,0.3\right>$. It has been found that: (i) The critical temperature (Tc) changes in the range from 243 K to 180 K. (ii) The values of the ratio of the energy gap to the critical temperature ($R_Δ\equiv 2Δ\left(0\right)/k_{B}T_{C}$) can be found in the range from 5.42 to 5.02. (iii) The ratio of the specific heat jump ($ΔC\left(T_{C}\right)$) to the value of the specific heat in the normal state ($C^{N}\left(T_{C}\right)$), which has been represented by the symbol Rc, takes the values from 3.30 to 3.18. (iv) The ratio $R_{H}\equiv T_{C}C^{N}\left(T_{C}\right)/H^{2}_{C}\left(0\right)$, where $H_{C}\left(0\right)$ denotes the critical thermodynamic field, changes from 0.122 to 0.125. The study has brought out the expressions that correctly predict the values of the thermodynamic parameters for the superconducting state in CaH6 and for the compounds: SiH4(H2)2, Si2H6, B2H6, SiH4, GeH4, and PtH. Next, in the whole family of the hydrogen-rich compounds, the possible ranges of the values have been determined for Tc, $R_Δ$, Rc, and $R_{H}$. It has been found that the maximum value of the critical temperature can be equal to 764 K, which very well correlates with Tc for metallic hydrogen (p=2 TPa). Other parameters ($R_Δ$, Rc, and $R_{H}$) should not deviate from the predictions of the BCS theory more than the analogous parameters for CaH6.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.