Paper detail

The thermo-wetting instability driving Leidenfrost film collapse

Above a critical temperature known as the Leidenfrost point (LFP), a heated surface can suspend a liquid droplet above a film of its own vapor. The insulating vapor film can be highly detrimental in metallurgical quenching and thermal control of electronic devices, but may also be harnessed to reduce drag and generate power. Manipulation of the LFP has occurred mostly through experiment, giving rise to a variety of semi-empirical models that account for the Rayleigh-Taylor instability, nucleation rates, and superheat limits. However, a truly comprehensive model has been difficult given that the LFP varies dramatically for different fluids and is affected by system pressure, surface roughness and liquid wettability. Here, we identify the vapor film instability for small length scales that ultimately sets the collapse condition at the Leidenfrost point. From a linear stability analysis, it is shown that the main film stabilizing mechanisms are the liquid-vapor surface tension, viscous transport of vapor mass, and evaporation at the liquid-vapor interface. Meanwhile, van der Waals interaction between the bulk liquid and the solid substrate across the vapor phase drives film collapse. This physical insight into vapor film dynamics allows us to derive an ab-initio, mathematical expression for the Leidenfrost point of a fluid. The expression captures the experimental data on the LFP for different fluids under various surface wettabilities and ambient pressures. For fluids that wet the surface (small intrinsic contact angle), the expression can be simplified to a single, dimensionless number that encapsulates the thermo-wetting instability governing the LFP.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.