Paper detail

The symmetry energy $γ$ parameter of relativistic mean-field models

The relativistic mean-field models tested in previous works against nuclear matter experimental values, critical parameters and macroscopic stellar properties are revisited and used in the evaluation of the symmetry energy $γ$ parameter obtained in three different ways. We have checked that independent of the choice made to calculate the $γ$ values, a trend of linear correlation is observed between $γ$ and the symmetry energy ($\mathcal{S}_0$) and a more clear linear relationship is established between $γ$ and the slope of the symmetry energy ($L_0$). These results directly contribute to the arising of other linear correlations between $γ$ and the neutron star radii of $R_{1.0}$ and $R_{1.4}$, in agreement with recent findings. Finally, we have found that short-range correlations induce two specific parametrizations, namely, IU-FSU and DD-ME$δ$, simultaneouslycompatible with the neutron star mass constraint of $1.93 < M_{max}/M_\odot < 2.05$ and with the overlap band for the $L_0\times\mathcal{S}_0$ region, to present $γ$ in the range of $γ=0.25\pm0.05$.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.