Paper detail

The Star Formation Rate of Supersonic MHD Turbulence

This work presents a new physical model of the star formation rate (SFR), verified with an unprecedented set of large numerical simulations of driven, supersonic, self-gravitating, magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence, where collapsing cores are captured with accreting sink particles. The model depends on the relative importance of gravitational, turbulent, magnetic, and thermal energies, expressed through the virial parameter, alpha_vir, the rms sonic Mach number, M_S,0, and the ratio of mean gas pressure to mean magnetic pressure, beta_0. The SFR is predicted to decrease with increasing alpha_vir (stronger turbulence relative to gravity), to increase with increasing M_S,0 (for constant values of alpha_vir), and to depend weakly on beta_0 for values typical of star forming regions (M_S,0 ~ 4-20 and beta_0 ~ 1-20). In the unrealistic limit of beta_0 -> infinity, that is in the complete absence of a magnetic field, the SFR increases approximately by a factor of three, which shows the importance of magnetic fields in the star formation process, even when they are relatively weak (super-Alfvenic turbulence). In this non-magnetized limit, our definition of the critical density for star formation has the same dependence on alpha_vir, and almost the same dependence on M_S,0, as in the model of Krumholz and McKee, although our physical derivation does not rely on the concepts of local turbulent pressure and sonic scale. However, our model predicts a different dependence of the SFR on alpha_vir and M_S,0 than the model of Krumholz and McKee. The star-formation simulations used to test the model result in an approximately constant SFR, after an initial transient phase. Both the value of the SFR and its dependence on the virial parameter found in the simulations are shown to agree very well with the theoretical predictions.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.