Paper detail

The second-order reduced density matrix method and the two-dimensional Hubbard model

The second-order reduced density matrix method (the RDM method) has performed well in determining energies and properties of atomic and molecular systems, achieving coupled-cluster singles and doubles with perturbative triples (CC SD(T)) accuracy without using the wave-function. One question that arises is how well does the RDM method perform with the same conditions that result in CCSD(T) accuracy in the strong correlation limit. The simplest and a theoretically important model for strongly correlated electronic systems is the Hubbard model. In this paper, we establish the utility of the RDM method when employing the $P$, $Q$, $G$, $T1$ and $T2^\prime$ conditions in the two-dimension al Hubbard model case and we conduct a thorough study applying the $4\times 4$ Hubbard model employing a coefficients. Within the Hubbard Hamilt onian we found that even in the intermediate setting, where $U/t$ is between 4 and 10, the $P$, $Q$, $G$, $T1$ and $T2^\prime$ conditions re produced good ground state energies.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.