Paper detail

The role of the time-arrow in mean-square estimation of stochastic processes

The purpose of this paper is to explain a certain dichotomy between the information that the past and future values of a multivariate stochastic process carry about the present. More specifically, vector-valued, second-order stochastic processes may be deterministic in one time-direction and not the other. This phenomenon, which is absent in scalar-valued processes, is deeply rooted in the geometry of the shift-operator. The exposition and the examples we discuss are based on the work of Douglas, Shapiro and Shields on cyclic vectors of the backward shift and relate to classical ideas going back to Wiener and Kolmogorov. We focus on rank-one stochastic processes for which we present a characterization of all regular processes that are deterministic in the reverse time-direction. The paper builds on examples and the goal is to provide pertinent insights to a control engineering audience.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.