Paper detail

The role of intrinsic distances in the relaxation of $L^\infty$-functionals

We consider a supremal functional of the form $$F(u)=\mathop{\rm ess\: sup }_{x \in Ω} f(x,Du(x))$$ where $Ω\subseteq \mathbf {R}^N$ is a regular bounded open set, $u\in W^{1,\infty}(Ω)$ and $f$ is a Borel function. Assuming that the intrinsic distances $d^λ_F(x,y):= \sup \Big\{ u(x) - u(y): \, F(u)\leq λ\Big\}$ are locally equivalent to the euclidean one for every $λ>\inf_{W^{1,\infty}(Ω)} F$, we give a description of the sublevel sets of the weak$^*$-lower semicontinuous envelope of $F$ in terms of the sub-level sets of the difference quotient functionals $R_{d^λ_F}(u):=\sup_{x\not =y} \frac{u(x)-u(y)}{d^λ_F(x,y)}. $ As a consequence we prove that the relaxed functional of positive $1$-homogeneous supremal functionals coincides with $R_{d^1_F}$. Moreover, for a more general supremal functional $F$ (a priori non coercive), we prove that the sublevel sets of its relaxed functionals with respect to the weak$^*$ topology, the weak$^*$ convergence and the uniform convergence are convex. The proof of these results relies both on a deep analysis of the intrinsic distances associated to $F$ and on a careful use of variational tools such as $Γ$-convergence.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.