Paper detail

The role of conditional probability in multi-scale stationary Markovian processes

The aim of the paper is to understand how the inclusion of more and more time-scales into a stochastic stationary Markovian process affects its conditional probability. To this end, we consider two Gaussian processes: (i) a short-range correlated process with an infinite set of time-scales bounded from below, and (ii) a power-law correlated process with an infinite and unbounded set of time-scales. For these processes we investigate the equal position conditional probability P(x,t|x,0) and the mean First Passage Time T(L). The function P(x,t|x,0) can be considered as a proxy of the persistence, i.e. the fact that when a process reaches a position x then it spends some time around that position value. The mean First Passage Time can be considered as a proxy of how fast is the process in reaching a position at distance L starting from position x. In the first investigation we show that the more time-scales the process includes, the larger the persistence. Specifically, we show that the power-law correlated process shows a slow power-law decay of P(x,t|x,0) to the stationary pdf. By contrast, the short range correlated process shows a decay dominated by an exponential cut-off. Moreover, we also show that the existence of an infinite and unbouded set of time-scales is a necessary and not sufficient condition for observing a slow power-law decay of P(x,t|x,0). In the second investigation, we show that for large values of L the more time-scales the process includes, the larger the mean First Passage Time, i.e. the slowest the process. On the other hand, for small values of L, the more time-scales the process includes, the smaller the mean First Passage Time, i.e. when a process statistically spends more time in a given position the likelihood that it reached nearby positions by chance is also enhanced.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.