Paper detail

The RKHS Approach to Minimum Variance Estimation Revisited: Variance Bounds, Sufficient Statistics, and Exponential Families

The mathematical theory of reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS) provides powerful tools for minimum variance estimation (MVE) problems. Here, we extend the classical RKHS based analysis of MVE in several directions. We develop a geometric formulation of five known lower bounds on the estimator variance (Barankin bound, Cramer-Rao bound, constrained Cramer-Rao bound, Bhattacharyya bound, and Hammersley-Chapman-Robbins bound) in terms of orthogonal projections onto a subspace of the RKHS associated with a given MVE problem. We show that, under mild conditions, the Barankin bound (the tightest possible lower bound on the estimator variance) is a lower semicontinuous function of the parameter vector. We also show that the RKHS associated with an MVE problem remains unchanged if the observation is replaced by a sufficient statistic. Finally, for MVE problems conforming to an exponential family of distributions, we derive novel closed-form lower bound on the estimator variance and show that a reduction of the parameter set leaves the minimum achievable variance unchanged.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.