Paper detail

The Riemann constant for a non-symmetric Weierstrass semigroup

The zero divisor of the theta function of a compact Riemann surface $X$ of genus $g$ is the canonical theta divisor of Pic${}^{(g-1)}$ up to translation by the Riemann constant $Δ$ for a base point $P$ of $X$. The complement of the Weierstrass gaps at the base point $P$ given as a numerical semigroup plays an important role, which is called the Weierstrass semigroup. It is classically known that the Riemann constant $Δ$ is a half period $\frac{1}{2}Γ_τ$ for the Jacobi variety $\mathcal{J}(X)=\mathbb{C}^g/Γ_τ$ of $X$ if and only if the Weierstrass semigroup at $P$ is symmetric. In this article, we analyze the non-symmetric case. Using a semi-canonical divisor $D_0$, we show a relation between the Riemann constant $Δ$ and a half period $\frac{1}{2}Γ_τ$ of the non-symmetric case. We also identify the semi-canonical divisor $D_0$ for trigonal curves, and remark on an algebraic expression for the Jacobi inversion problem using the relation

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.