Paper detail

The Richardson's Annular effect and a transient solution of oscillating pressure-driven flow in circular pipes

In this paper it is shown that the location of the characteristic overshoot of the Richardson's annular effect changes with the Kinematic Reynolds number $ω^*=ωr_0^2 /ν$ in the range of frequencies within the laminar regime. From the study of the Richardson's overshoot at different times it was identified the existence of aparent transverse damped waves similar to those ones observed in the famous Stokes second problem, the physical analysis of this waves was used for the establishment of a semi-empirical law that gives the functional relation of the mean overshoot maximum with the kinematic reynolds number, say $B_0(ω^*)=2.28 + 0.51{ω^*}^{-1/2}$. Finally a transient solution was constructed and verified asymptotically for large times, and the tipical time for which the transient solution resembles the steady oscillating one was identified to be dependent of the viscosity of the fluid and of the radius of the pipe.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.