Paper detail

The relative effects of dimensionality and multiplicity of hypotheses on the F-test in linear regression

Recently, several authors have re-examined the power of the classical F-test in linear regression in a `large-p, large-n' framework (cf. Zhong and Chen (2011), Wang and Cui (2013)). They highlight the loss of power as the number of regressors p increases relative to sample size n. These papers essentially focus only on the overall test of the null hypothesis that all p slope coefficients are equal to zero. Here, we consider the general case of testing q linear hypotheses on the (p+1)-dimensional regression parameter vector that includes p slope coefficients and an intercept parameter. In the case of Gaussian design, we describe the dependence of the local asymptotic power function on both the relative number of parameters p and the number of hypotheses q being tested, showing that the negative effect of dimensionality is less severe if the number of hypotheses is small. Using the recent work of Srivastava and Vershynin (2013) on high dimensional sample covariance matrices we are also able to substantially generalize previous results for non-Gaussian regressors.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.