Paper detail

The Radio Continuum, Far-Infrared Emission, And Dense Molecular Gas In Galaxies

A tight linear correlation is established between the HCN line luminosity and the radio continuum (RC) luminosity for a sample of 65 galaxies (from Gao & Solomon's HCN survey), including normal spiral galaxies and luminous and ultraluminous infrared galaxies (LIRGs/ULIRGs). After analyzing the various correlations among the global far-infrared (FIR), RC, CO, and HCN luminosities and their various ratios, we conclude that the FIR-RC and FIR-HCN correlations appear to be linear and are the tightest among all correlations. The combination of these two correlations could result in the tight RC-HCN correlation we observed. Meanwhile, the non-linear RC-CO correlation shows slightly larger scatter as compared with the RC-HCN correlation, and there is no correlation between ratios of either RC/HCN-CO/HCN or RC/FIR-CO/FIR. In comparison, a meaningful correlation is still observed between ratios of RC/CO-HCN/CO. Nevertheless, the correlation between RC/FIR and HCN/FIR also disappears, reflecting again the two tightest FIR-RC and FIR-HCN correlations as well as suggesting that FIR seems to be the bridge that connects HCN with RC. Interestingly, despite obvious HCN-RC and RC-CO correlations, multi-parameter fits hint that while both RC and HCN contribute significantly (with no contribution from CO) to FIR, yet RC is primarily determined from FIR with a very small contribution from CO and essentially no contribution from HCN. These analyses confirm independently the former conclusions that it is practical to use RC luminosity instead of FIR luminosity, at least globally, as an indicator of star formation rate in galaxies including LIRGs/ULIRGs, and HCN is a much better tracer of star-forming molecular gas and correlates with FIR much better than that of CO.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.