Paper detail

The radiative decays of $0^{++}$ and $1^{+-}$ heavy mesons

The radiative decay is believed to be an ideal lab to study hadronic structure of newly observed resonances because the reactions are governed by only the electromagnetic interaction (tree level). However, to obtain correct theoretical values, one has to properly deal with the non-perturbative QCD effects in the wavefunction and hadronization. In this work we derive the formulas for the radiative decays of $0^{++}$ and $1^{-+}$ heavy mesons in the light front quark model (LFQM). Because $\mathcal{B}(χ_{c0}\rightarrow J/ψγ)$ is well measured, the theoretical evaluation of the transition rate can be used to test our approach. Within this theoretical framework, the width of $χ_{b0}\rightarrow Υ(1S)γ$ is evaluated. The formulas can be applied to identify the inner structures of new resonances, for example the isospin of $h_{c(b)}$ and the structure of $D_s(2317)$, via processes $h_c\rightarrow η_cγ$, $h_b\rightarrow η_bγ$ and $D_s(2317)\rightarrow D_s^*+γ$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.