Paper detail

The Quadrahelix: A Nearly Perfect Loop of Tetrahedra

In 1958, S. Świerczkowski proved that there cannot be a closed loop of congruent interior-disjoint regular tetrahedra that meet face-to-face. Such closed loops do exist for the other four regular polyhedra. It has been conjectured that, for any positive ε, there is a tetrahedral loop such that its difference from a closed loop is less than ε. We prove this conjecture by presenting a very simple pattern that can generate loops of tetrahedra in a rhomboid shape having arbitrarily small gap. Moreover, computations provide explicit examples where the error is under $10^{-100}$ or $10^{-10^{6}}$. The explicit examples arise from a certain Diophantine relation whose solutions can be found through continued fractions; for more complicated patterns a lattice reduction technique is needed.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.