Paper detail

The QCD improved electroweak parameter $ρ$

In the present paper, we make a detailed analysis for the QCD corrections to the electroweak $ρ$ parameter by applying the principle of maximum conformality (PMC). As a comparison, we show that under the conventional scale setting, we have $Δρ|_{\rm N^3LO} = \left(8.257^{+0.045}_{-0.012}\right) \times10^{-3}$ by varying the scale $μ_{r}\in[M_{t}/2$, $2M_{t}]$. By defining a ratio, $ΔR=Δρ/3X_t-1$, which shows the relative importance of the QCD corrections, it is found that its scale error is $\sim \pm9 \%$ at the two-loop level, which changes to $\sim\pm4\%$ at the three-loop level and $\sim \pm 2.5\%$ at the four-loop level, respectively. These facts well explain why the conventional scale uncertainty constitutes an important error for estimating the $ρ$ parameter. On the other hand, by applying the PMC scale setting, the four-loop estimation $Δρ|_{\rm N^3LO}$ shall be almost fixed to $8.228\times10^{-3}$, which indicates that the conventional scale error has been eliminated. We observe the pQCD convergence for the $ρ$ parameter has also been greatly improved due to the elimination of the divergent renormalon terms. As applications of the present QCD improved $ρ$ parameter, we show the shifts of the $W$-boson mass and the effective leptonic weak-mixing angle due to $Δρ$ can be reduced to $δM_{W}|_{\rm N^3LO} =0.7$ MeV and $δ\sin^2θ_{\rm eff}|_{\rm N^3LO}=-0.4\times10^{-5}$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.