Paper detail

The production and escape of Lyman-Continuum radiation from star-forming galaxies at z~2 and their redshift evolution

We study the production rate of ionizing photons of a sample of 588 H$α$ emitters (HAEs) and 160 Lyman-$α$ emitters (LAEs) at $z=2.2$ in the COSMOS field in order to assess the implied emissivity from galaxies, based on their UV luminosity. By exploring the rest-frame Lyman Continuum (LyC) with GALEX/$NUV$ data, we find f$_{\rm esc} < 2.8\, (6.4)$% through median (mean) stacking. By combining the H$α$ luminosity density with IGM emissivity measurements from absorption studies, we find a globally averaged $\langle$f$_{\rm esc}\rangle$ of $5.9^{+14.5}_{-4.2}$ % at $z=2.2$ if we assume HAEs are the only source of ionizing photons. We find similarly low values of the global $\langle$f$_{\rm esc}\rangle$ at $z\approx3-5$, also ruling out a high $\langle$f$_{\rm esc}\rangle$ at $z<5$. These low escape fractions allow us to measure $ξ_{ion}$, the number of produced ionizing photons per unit UV luminosity, and investigate how this depends on galaxy properties. We find a typical $ξ_{ion} \approx 10^{24.77\pm0.04}$ Hz erg$^{-1}$ for HAEs and $ξ_{ion} \approx 10^{25.14\pm0.09}$ Hz erg$^{-1}$ for LAEs. LAEs and low mass HAEs at $z=2.2$ show similar values of $ξ_{ion}$ as typically assumed in the reionization era, while the typical HAE is three times less ionizing. Due to an increasing $ξ_{ion}$ with increasing EW(H$α$), $ξ_{ion}$ likely increases with redshift. This evolution alone is fully in line with the observed evolution of $ξ_{ion}$ between $z\approx2-5$, indicating a typical value of $ξ_{ion} \approx 10^{25.4}$ Hz erg$^{-1}$ in the reionization era.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.