Paper detail

The PASEP at q=-1

We investigate the partially asymmetric exclusion process (PASEP) with open boundaries when the reverse hopping rate of particles q=-1, using a representation of the PASEP algebra related to the al-Salam Chihara polynomials. When q=-1 the representation is two-dimensional, which allows for straightforward calculation of the normalization, current and density. We note that these quantities behave in an a priori reasonable manner in spite of the apparently unphysical value of q as the input, alpha, and output, beta, rates are varied over the physical range of 0 to 1. As is well known, another two dimensional representation exists when 0<q<1 and abq=1, where a=(1-q)/beta -1 and b=(1-q)/beta-1, and we compare the behaviour at q=-1 with this. An extension to generalized boundary conditions where particles may enter and exit at both ends is briefly outlined. We also note that a different representation related to the q-harmonic oscillator does not admit a straightforward truncation when q=-1 and discuss why this is the case from the perspective of a lattice path interpretation of the PASEP normalization.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.