Paper detail

The parton bubble model compared to central Au Au collisions (0% to 5%) at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV

In an earlier paper we developed a Parton Bubble Model (PBM) for RHIC, high-energy heavy-ion collisions. PBM was based on a substructure of a ring of localized bubbles (gluonic hot spots) which initially contain 3-4 partons composed of almost entirely gluons. The bubbles emitted correlated particles at kinetic freezeout, leading to a lumpy fireball surface. For a selection of charged particles (0.8 GeV/c $<$ $p_t$ $<$ 4.0 GeV/c), the PBM reasonably quantitatively (within a few percent) explained high precision RHIC experimental correlation analyses in a manner which was consistent with the small observed HBT source size in this transverse momentum range. We demonstrated that surface emission from a distributed set of surface sources (as in the PBM) was necessary to obtain this consistency. In this paper we give a review of the above comparison to central Au Au collisions. The bubble formation can be associated with gluonic objects predicted by a Glasma Flux Tube Model (GFTM) that formed longitudinal flux tubes in the transverse plane of two colliding sheets of Color Glass Condensate (CGC), which pass through one another. These sheets create boost invariant flux tubes of longitudinal color electric and magnetic fields. A blast wave gives the tubes near the surface transverse flow in the same way it gave transverse flow to the bubbles in the PBM. In the GFTM the longitudinal color electric and magnetic fields have a non-zero topological charge density $F \widetilde F$. These fields cause a local strong CP violation which effects charged particle production coming from quarks and anti-quarks created in the tube or bubble.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.