Paper detail

The origin of metals in the circum-galactic medium of massive galaxies at z=3

We present a detailed study of the metal-enriched circum-galactic medium of a massive galaxy at z=3 using "ErisMC", a new cosmological hydrodynamic "zoom-in" simulations of a disk galaxy with mass comparable to the Milky Way. The run adopts a blastwave scheme for supernova feedback that generates galactic outflows without explicit wind particles, a star formation recipe based on a high gas density threshold, and high temperature metal cooling. ErisMC's main progenitor at z=3 resembles a "Lyman break" galaxy of mass M_vir=2.4e11 M_sun, virial radius R_vir=48 kpc, and star formation rate 18 M_sun/yr, and its metal-enriched CGM extends to 200 (physical) kpc from its center. Approximately 41, 9, and 50 percent of all gas-phase metals at z=3 are locked in a hot (T> 3e5 K), warm (3e5 >T> 3e4 K), and cold (T< 3e4 K) medium, respectively. We identify three sources of heavy elements: 1) the main host, responsible for 60% of all the metals found within 3R_vir; 2) its satellite progenitors, responsible for 28% of all the metals within 3R_vir, and for only 5% of those beyond 3R_vir; and nearby dwarfs, which give origin to 12% of all the metals within 3R_vir and 95% of those beyond 3R_vir. Late (z<5) galactic "superwinds" account for only 9% of all the metals observed beyond 2R_vir, the bulk having been released at redshifts 5< z < 8 by early star formation and outflows. In the CGM, lower overdensities are typically enriched by `older', colder metals. Heavy elements are accreted onto Eris along filaments via low-metallicity cold inflows, and are ejected hot via galactic outflows at a few hundred km/s. The outflow mass-loading factor is of order unity for the main halo, but can exceed 10 for nearby dwarfs. We stress that our "zoom-in" simulation focuses on the CGM of a single massive system and cannot describe the enrichment history of the IGM as a whole. (abridged)

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.