Paper detail

The nonadditive entropy $S_q$: A door open to the nonuniversality of the mathematical expression of the Clausius thermodynamic entropy in terms of the probabilities of the microscopic configurations

Clausius introduced, in the 1860s, a thermodynamical quantity which he named {\it entropy} $S$. This thermodynamically crucial quantity was proposed to be {\it extensive}, i.e., in contemporary terms, $S(N) \propto N$ in the thermodynamic limit $N \to\infty$. A decade later, Boltzmann proposed a functional form for this quantity which connects $S$ with the occurrence probabilities of the microscopic configurations (referred to as {\it complexions} at that time) of the system. This functional is, if written in modern words referring to a system with $W$ possible discrete states, $S_{BG}=-k_B \sum_{i=1}^W p_i \ln p_i$. The BG entropy is {\it additive}, meaning that, if A and B are two probabilistically independent systems, then $S_{BG}(A+B)=S_{BG}(A)+S_{BG}(B)$. The words, {\it extensive} and {\it additive}, were practically treated, for over more than one century, as almost synonyms, and $S_{BG}$ was considered to be the unique form that $S$ could take. In other words, the functional $S_{BG}$ was considered to be universal. It has become increasingly clear today that it is {\it not} so, and that those two words are {\it not} synonyms, but happen to coincide whenever we are dealing with paradigmatic Hamiltonians involving {\it short-range} interactions between their elements, presenting no strong frustration and other "pathologies". These facts constitute the basis of a generalization of the BG entropy and statistical mechanics, introduced in 1988, and frequently referred to as nonadditive entropy $S_q$ and nonextensive statistical mechanics, respectively. We briefly review herein these points, and exhibit recent as well as typical applications of these concepts in natural, artificial, and social systems, as shown through theoretical, experimental, observational and computational predictions and verifications.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.