Paper detail

The nature of the continuous nonequilibrium phase transition of Axelrod's model

Axelrod's model in the square lattice with nearest-neighbors interactions exhibits culturally homogeneous as well as culturally fragmented absorbing configurations. In the case the agents are characterized by $F=2$ cultural features and each feature assumes $k$ states drawn from a Poisson distribution of parameter $q$ these regimes are separated by a continuous transition at $q_c = 3.10 \pm 0.02$. Using Monte Carlo simulations and finite size scaling we show that the mean density of cultural domains $μ$ is an order parameter of the model that vanishes as $μ\sim \left ( q - q_c \right)^β$ with $β= 0.67 \pm 0.01$ at the critical point. In addition, for the correlation length critical exponent we find $ν= 1.63 \pm 0.04$ and for Fisher's exponent, $τ= 1.76 \pm 0.01$. This set of critical exponents places the continuous phase transition of Axelrod's model apart from the known universality classes of nonequilibrium lattice models.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.