Paper detail

The multilinear Hormander multiplier theorem with a Lorentz-Sobolev condition

In this article, we provide a multilinear version of the Hörmander multiplier theorem with a Lorentz-Sobolev space condition. The work is motivated by the recent result of the first author and Slavíková where an analogous version of classical Hörmander multiplier theorem was obtained; this version is sharp in many ways and reduces the number of indices that appear in the statement of the theorem. As a natural extension of the linear case, in this work, we prove that if $mn/2<s<mn$, then $$ \big\Vert T_σ(f_1,\dots,f_m)\big\Vert_{L^p((\mathbb{R})^n)}\lesssim \sup_{k\in\mathbb{Z}}\big\Vert σ(2^k\;\vec{\cdot}\;)\widehat{Ψ^{(m)}}\big\Vert_{L_{s}^{mn/s,1}(\mathbb{R}^{mn})}\Vert f_1\Vert_{L^{p_1}((\mathbb{R})^n)}\cdots \Vert f_m\Vert_{L^{p_m}((\mathbb{R})^n)} $$ for certain $p,p_1,\dots,p_m$ with $1/p=1/p_1+\dots+1/p_m$. We also show that the above estimate is sharp, in the sense that the Lorentz-Sobolev space $L_s^{mn/s,1}$ cannot be replaced by $L_{s}^{r,q}$ for $r<mn/s$, $0<q\leq \infty$, or by $L_s^{mn/s,q}$ for $q>1$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.