Paper detail

The metastable minima of the Heisenberg spin glass in a random magnetic field

We have studied zero temperature metastable states in classical $m$-vector component spin glasses in the presence of $m$-component random fields (of strength $h_{r}$) for a variety of models, including the Sherrington Kirkpatrick (SK) model, the Viana Bray (VB) model and the randomly diluted one-dimensional models with long-range power law interactions. For the SK model we have calculated analytically its complexity (the log of the number of minima) for both the annealed case and the quenched case, both for fields above and below the de Almeida Thouless (AT) field ($h_{AT} > 0$ for $m>2$). We have done quenches starting from a random initial state by putting spins parallel to their local fields until convergence and found that in zero field it always produces minima which have zero overlap with each other. For the $m=2$ and $m=3$ cases in the SK model the final energy reached in the quench is very close to the energy $E_c$ at which the overlap of the states would acquire replica symmetry breaking features. These minima have marginal stability and will have long-range correlations between them. In the SK limit we have analytically studied the density of states $ρ(λ)$ of the Hessian matrix in the annealed approximation. Despite the absence of continuous symmetries, the spectrum extends down to zero with the usual $\sqrtλ$ form for the density of states for $h_{r}<h_{AT}$. However, when $h_{r}>h_{AT}$, there is a gap in the spectrum which closes up as $h_{AT}$ is approached. For the VB model and the other models our numerical work shows that there always exist some low-lying eigenvalues and there never seems to be a gap. There is no sign of the AT transition in the quenched states reached from infinite temperature for any model but the SK model, which is the only model which has zero complexity above $h_{AT}$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.