Paper detail

The mean square radius of the neutron distribution and the skin thickness derived from electron scattering

The second-order moment of the nuclear charge density($R^2_c$) is dominated by the mean square radius(msr) of the point proton distribution($R_p^2$), while the fourth-order moment($Q^4_c$) depends on the msr of the point neutron one($R_n^2$) also. Moreover, $R^2_n$ is strongly correlated to $R^2_c$ in nuclear models. According to these facts, the linear relationship between various moments in the nuclear mean field models are investigated with use of the least squares method for $^{40}$Ca, $^{48}$Ca and $^{208}$Pb. From the intersection points of the obtained straight lines with those of the experimental values for $R^2_c$ and $Q^4_c$ determined through electron scattering, the values of $R_p$ and $R_n$ are estimated. Since relativistic and non-relativistic models provide different lines, the obtained values of $R_n$ and the skin thickness($R_n-R_p$) differ from each other in the two frameworks.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.