Paper detail

The Mathematics of the Ensemble Theory

This study shows that the generalized Boltzmann distribution is the only distribution mathematically consistent with thermodynamics when the system is described by an ensemble of a certain mathematical form. This mathematical form is very general, such that the canonical, grand-canonical, or isothermal-isobaric ensemble theories are all special cases of this form. Compared with the standard textbook formalism of the statistical mechanics (SM), this approach does not require a prior distribution, does not assume the functional form or maximization of entropy, and employs fewer assumptions. Therefore, this new insight challenges the belief on the requirement of a prior distribution in SM and provides a new way to derive the Boltzmann distribution. This study also reveals the logical and mathematical constraints of SM's fundamental components; therefore, it could potentially benefit researchers on non-Boltzmann-Gibbs SM and philosophers studying the foundations of SM.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.